Employment Rules – Statements – Overseas Worker

Employment Rules – Statements – Overseas Worker

In the case Saggar v Ministry of Defence [2005] , it turned out held an overseas based employee from the British business, who was simply just a UK resident when recruited or anytime through the employee’s employment, is qualified to receive give a discrimination claim in britain . The claim could possibly be brought also if the employee did forget about function in Britain following a move overseas.

After 16 years at a Ministry of Defence base in Britain , Lieutenant Colonel Surinder Nath Saggar was completely stationed in Cyprus from 1998 and was still certainly, there when he created a claim for competition discrimination.

THE TASK Tribunal determined that Lieutenant Saggar worked wholly outside Britain and could not file a race discrimination claim in Britain . He appealed out of this decision towards the task Appeals Tribunal (“EAT”).

The EAT dismissed the appeal and held that:-

For Lieutenant Saggar’s state to have success, the EAT would have to feel the whole of his work from 1982 onwards, and that could be “absurd”;

The EAT was bound by the selection of the Courtroom of Appeal regarding Carver v Saudi Arabian Airlines [1999] where for the purposes of establishing if a tribunal has jurisdiction to hear a claim, it is important to consider whether, through the alleged discrimination, the claimant was wholly or mainly used in Great Britain;
Accordingly, through the alleged discrimination, Lieutenant Saggar worked wholly in Cyprus .
The situation visited the Courtroom of Attraction and it turned out chose that: –

The relevant period for determining whether a claimant worked wholly or mainly beyond your UK could be the complete amount of employment;
This technique was supported using the wording in s 8(1) in the Race Relations Act 1976; and
This decision applied equally to all or any or any employees even though a person serving in the MILITARY isn’t an employee as there is no contract of service.
The problem was remitted to a fresh tribunal to consider the issue of jurisdiction in accordance with the Court of Appeal’s judgment.

Comment: That is clearly a substantial decision towards workers. Meaning oftentimes where employees are posted abroad they possess entitlement to supply employment claims in britain . Used, aswell as complying with the rules of america where employees will continue to work, it could be practical for companies to use British employment legislation criteria aswell.

Please e-mail us for more information: enquiries@

RT COOPERS, 2005. This Briefing Take notice does not provide a comprehensive or comprehensive declaration of rules relating to the issues discussed nor would it not constitute legal providers. It really is designed and then showcase general complications. Specialist legal solutions should always become sought in relation to particular circumstances.